Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Environ Qual ; 52(5): 972-983, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37391883

RESUMO

Efforts to mitigate the nitrogen (N) footprint of maize production include using N-fixing microbes (NFM) and/or microbial inhibitors. We quantified the effects of NFM, the nitrification inhibitor (NI) 2-(N-3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl) succinic acid isomeric mixture, and the urease inhibitor (UI) N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide, each applied by itself or paired with another additive, on nitrous oxide (N2 O) emissions, nitrate (NO3 - ) leaching, and crop performance in contrasting irrigated and rainfed maize systems over two growing seasons. We also used published emission factors to estimate indirect N2 O emissions from leached NO3 - that can be converted to N2 O. Agronomic effects were relatively small; the NI + NFM treatment increased N use efficiency and grain yield and protein content in some cases by 11%-14% relative to a treatment receiving only urea. Most of the additive treatments reduced direct (in-field) N2 O emissions, most consistently for treatments that contained NI which reduced emissions by 24%-77%. However, these beneficial effects were counteracted by increased NO3 - leaching, which occurred most consistently with UI or NFM applied as single additives or with NI. In these treatments, NO3 - leaching increased during at least one growing season, and at both sites, by factors of 2-7. In three site-years, increased NO3 - leaching with NFM and NI + NFM offset large reductions in direct N2 O, such that total direct + indirect N2 O emissions were not different from that in the urea only treatment. These unintended effects may have resulted from unfavorable rainfall timing, varying crop N demand, and declining additive effectiveness. Use of these soil additives requires caution and further study.


Assuntos
Nitrogênio , Zea mays , Nitrogênio/análise , Fertilizantes/análise , Solo , Agricultura/métodos , Óxido Nitroso/análise , Ureia
2.
J Sci Food Agric ; 102(8): 3078-3087, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34778954

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Potato is an essential crop for global food security, and its cultivation requires a significant amount of readily available nitrogen (N) to ensure tuber quality. Therefore, managing N with enhanced-efficiency fertilizers becomes a potential strategy to meet the seasonal potato N demand. A 3 site-years (SYs) study was conducted to assess the marketable attributes and mineral composition of table-stock potato in response to N rates and fertilizers urea, ammonium sulfate and ammonium sulfate nitrate (ASN) with nitrification inhibitor dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP). RESULTS: At 75% of recommended N rate (RNR), ammonium sulfate and ASN+DMPP ensured marketable tuber yields equivalent to that observed at 100% of RNR. Urea promoted greater tuber K and Mg concentrations than ammonium sulfate and ASN+DMPP. Although inconsistent across SYs, ASN+DMPP generally reduced starch and reducing sugars contents and increased pulp pH and protein content than other fertilizers. Increasing N rates from 50% up to 75% and 100% of RNR increased marketable tuber yields and protein content, whereas soluble solids increased from 50% to 100% of RNR. Conversely, increasing N rates from zero to 75% of RNR reduced tuber firmness, whereas N application reduced tuber P concentration, regardless of N rates. CONCLUSION: Although ASN+DMPP showed potential for increasing marketable tuber yield and protein content, potatoes receiving ammonium sulfate and ASN+DMPP lowered tuber K and Mg concentrations compared to those receiving urea. Overall, potato tuber quality improvements are N source-specific, demanding strategies under which these fertilizers can ensure/improve tuber nutritional composition along with size quality. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.


Assuntos
Fertilizantes , Solanum tuberosum , Sulfato de Amônio/metabolismo , Iodeto de Dimetilfenilpiperazina/metabolismo , Fertilizantes/análise , Minerais/metabolismo , Nitrogênio/metabolismo , Solo/química , Solanum tuberosum/metabolismo , Ureia/química
3.
Environ Pollut ; 284: 117124, 2021 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33915396

RESUMO

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production in irrigated coarse-textured soils requires intensive nitrogen (N) fertilization which may increase reactive N losses. Biological soil additives including N-fixing microbes (NFM) have been promoted as a means to increase crop N use efficiency, though few field studies have evaluated their effects, and none have examined the combined use of NFM with microbial inhibitors. A 2-year study (2018-19) in an irrigated loamy sand quantified the effects of the urease inhibitor NBPT, the nitrification inhibitor DMPSA, NFM, and the additive combinations DMPSA + NBPT and DMPSA + NFM on potato performance and growing season nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and nitrate (NO3-) leaching. All treatments, except a zero-N control, received diammonium phosphate at 45 kg N ha-1 and split applied urea at 280 kg N ha-1. Compared with urea alone, DMPSA + NBPT reduced NO3- leaching and N2O emissions by 25% and 62%, respectively, and increased crop N uptake by 19% in one year, although none of the additive treatments increased tuber yields. The DMPSA and DMPSA + NBPT treatments had greater soil ammonium concentration, and all DMPSA-containing treatments consistently reduced N2O emissions, compared to urea-only. Use of NBPT by itself reduced NO3- leaching by 21% across growing seasons and N2O emissions by 37% in 2018 relative to urea-only. In contrast to the inhibitors, NFM by itself increased N2O by 23% in 2019; however, co-applying DMPSA with NFM reduced N2O emissions by ≥ 50% compared to urea alone. These results demonstrate that DMPSA can mitigate N2O emissions in potato production systems and that DMPSA + NBPT can reduce both N2O and NO3- losses and increase the N supply for crop uptake. This is the first study to show that combining a nitrification inhibitor with NFM can result in decreased N2O emissions in contrast to unintended increases in N2O emissions that can occur when NFM is applied by itself.


Assuntos
Óxido Nitroso , Solanum tuberosum , Agricultura , Fertilizantes/análise , Nitratos , Nitrogênio , Óxido Nitroso/análise , Solo , Ureia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...